Category Archives: General paediatrics

Status Epilepticus

Resus council guideline 2021.

Definition (convulsive) – seizure lasting more than 5 minutes. Used to be 30 minutes! Unlikely to terminate spontaneously after 5 minutes. Evidence that the longer it lasts, the hard it is to treat.

Use existing seizure management plan, if there is one!

Buccal midazolam (0.3-0.5mg/kg depending on age) and IM/IO lorazepam 0.1mg/kg – max 2 doses of benzo’s, including any home/prehospital doses.

If no response to first dose after 5 minutes, go for IV lorazepam and prepare next step.

2nd line should then be within 15 minutes of start of seizure – Levetiracetam, phenytoin, phenobarb.

Phenytoin needs to go slowly (over 20 mins – risk of brady/asystole) cf levetiracetam (over 5 mins). Call anaesthetist.

After 5 mins, either try alternative or go for intubation and deep sedation: RSI with thiopental, or propofol +/- rocuronium. Ketamine and midaz given as alternatives as no evidence for 3rd line agent!

Meanwhile – check glucose, sodium, calcium/Mg (if sepsis). Temperature control.

Beware CNS haemorrhage (trauma?), raised intracranial pressure, meningitis, encephalitis.

[no rectal medicines mentioned but paraldehyde worked pretty well back in the day]

Sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy

Onset around age 9.

Can be just waking up, possibly confused, but multiple times a night.

Easier to diagnose if more dramatic twisting, grimacing, thrusting movements, posturing. Can be wandering like parasomnia, can be vocalisations (screaming, moaning, crying).

Can be aware during seizure. Can be sensation of unable to catch breath.

Usually around 30 secs.

Often inherited (prev called autosomal dominant frontal lobe epilepsy). Not always frontal!

Probably needs video EEG.

See also Panayiotopoulos (occipital lobe) epilepsy.

Mast cell activation syndrome

Recurrent mast cell degranulation causing episodes of hives, diarrhoea, swelling, dizziness, even anaphylaxis.

Thought to be due to clonal expansion of abnormal mast cells, not requiring usual triggers.

Diagnosis is on basis of rise in tryptase levels during an episode from base line. If base line tryptase is normal, then likely mastocytosis. Urine mast cell products eg leukotriene, prostaglandin? Look for KIT D816V on flow cytometry. Bone marrow aspiration?

Scoring systems available.

Treatment is predictably:

  • Antihistamines, preferably non sedating. Some people however benefit from the additional sedative effect of older antihistamines eg ketotifen, hydroxyzine.
  • Adrenaline autoinjectors for anaphylaxis self management
  • Montelukast/zafirlukast has systemic anti-inflammatory action
  • Famotidine has anti-histamine action
  • Steroids for short term use
  • Omalizumab

Citrus allergy

Orange, mandarin, tangerine all varieties of orange. Seeds probably rich in allergens but less likely to be eaten (chewing probably also required for reaction)!

Various allergens identified, including profilin (so oral allergy syndrome) and LTP (more in Mediterranean, cross reacts with Pru p3, not surprisingly).

One letter briefly touches on citrus cross reactivity – some tolerate lemon and/or tangerine, some had oral symptoms with tangerine, none had tried grapefruit. So varying and not well explored…

G6PD deficiency

Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. X-linked.

Can present with prolonged jaundice in babies. Otherwise with haemolysis (causing jaundice and anaemia).

Haemolysis triggered by infections, but also drugs and chemicals. Classically sulfonamides, but most relevant are:

  • Anti-malarials (ironically)
  • Nitrofurantoin!
  • Aspirin (so Kawasaki)
  • Henna! Other dyes
  • Moth balls!

Geographical risk areas –

Air transmission

Aerosol and droplet transmission are no longer in fashion – to be replaced by single term “air transmission”.

Similarly, no longer a list of defined “aerosol generating procedures” – flowchart to come that looks at whether coughing is induced and whether “high speed device” used.

[First letter from new Public Services Delivery body?!]

Travel with allergies

Paul Turner’s 2024 review of food allergies and commercial flights

  • Research (including aircraft simulations) show no evidence to support airborne transmission of nut allergens as a likely phenomenon. Announcements requesting ’nut bans’ are not therefore supported, and may instal a false sense of security.
  • The most effective measure is for passengers to wipe down their seat area (including tray table and
    seat-back entertainment system). Food proteins are often ’sticky’ and adhere to these surfaces, from where they are easily transferred to a person’s hands and onto food that might be consumed. Airline companies can help to facilitate this through pre-boarding.
  • Passengers at risk of anaphylaxis should be prescribed two adrenaline autoinjector devices, to carry on their person at all times—including when flying. Airlines should consider including a separate supply of ’general use’ adrenaline autoinjectors in the onboard medical kit for use in an emergency.
  • All airlines should have clear policies relating to food allergies which are easily available from
    their websites or on request. These policies should be applied consistently by both ground staff and cabin crew, in order to provide reassurance to food-allergic passengers and their caregivers.
[I would say all children with a type 1 food allergy are at risk of anaphylaxis, but I would only prescribe EpiPens for someone at HIGHER risk]

Milk immunotherapy

66% of kids grow out cow’s milk allergy, even if they completely avoid it. But rate rises to nearly 90% if baked milk introduced. And less restrictive diet good for everyone, of course.

Salmivesi RCT from Finland 2012 – n=28, age 6-14. 81% using daily milk 6400mg protein at 12 months. First dose milk 0.06mg – 8 further observed doses (0.12mg day 8; 0.24mg day 15; 2.0mg day 36 [big jump!]; 4.0mg day 38 [2 days later!?]; 8.0mg day 42; 40mg [big jump again!] day 57; 80mg day 64; and 160mg on day 78) with other dose increases done at home. Monitored for 2hr in clinic. Final dose of 6400mg (=200ml) was given at home (!) on day 162.

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) for severe milk allergy (IgE >85 or low eliciting dose):  at 1yr 36% tolerated 150ml, 54% 5-150ml (good enough for accidental exposure). 10% could not complete protocol. [reference?]

DRACMA update on milk immunotherapy (2021) mostly fresh milk used in research. Randomized trials looked at kids aged 2-14, mean 8. Non randomized had wider range. 67% tolerated 150ml (cf 2.2% of controls), 78% tolerated 5-150ml (=swig protection) (cf 3.3% of controls). Anaphylaxis rate of 5.5 per person-years (although not always defined, and not always usual definition). 63% used IM adrenaline!?

6.9% developed EOE but rarely biopsy confirmed. No deaths.

2–8 weeks after discontinuation of successful OIT, tolerance of cow’s milk persisted in only 36% (20%–91%). So you have to persevere life long, probably.

Quality of life badly reported – only 5 studies. 1 study found parents reported better QOL in 37%, worse in 26%, and unchanged in 38%! 2 conference abstracts reported improved QOL or at least reduced anxiety in general and reduced fear of unexpected reaction. Some studies found worse QOL! Certainty of evidence overall v low…

Only 1 trial and 2 non randomized studies of baked milk OIT! In the 1 RCT of baked milk, 73% achieved tolerance at 12 months (cf none of control group) – other studies did not find evidence of effectiveness however (meta-analysis of Anagnostou. Tolerance to heated or baked milk may be temporary and diminish within a few years. Dantzer. 20% required adrenaline! Only some children assessed for QOL, with evidence of benefit – of the parents studied, no improvement in QOL! [Dantzer and Dunlop 2021]. Low desensitization rate for unheated milk means persisting concern about exposure in real life despite less frequent adverse reactions (8%–33%).

Other studies did not find this relationship, which is consistent with the meta-analysis results of Anagnostou et al. (41). Tolerance to heated or baked milk may be temporary and diminish within a few years. Dantzer et al. found that a protocol involving gradually increasing doses of baked milk was effective in promoting desensitization (73% achieved end dose of 4000mg cf 0% of controls).  Mean age 11. “This suggests that the initial dose [and then building] may influence the efficacy of desensitization.” [Yan Wang, China – Front. Immunol., 04 June 2025]

4% rate of biopsy proven EOE – note EoE typically emerges approximately 2.8 years after initiating the maintenance phase so many studies will miss…

Longer duration better. None of the studies reported on sustained unresponsiveness.

Only Dantzer study reported quality of life! 

Highlights “a dire need for a standardization in outcome assessment and reporting,” and that successful completion of OFC needs to be validated as a predictor of “real world” success. [Natasha trial will hopefully clarify further…]

Separate article on OIT recommendations – apart from balancing risks and benefits, recommends using omalizumab (monoclonal anti-IgE) in advance and in initial stages of oral immunotherapy with unheated cow’s milk. Inferring from limited evidence (use in other food allergies, mostly) that risk of anaphylaxis reduced (RR0.34 but not significant!). Not really any downside? (But costs at least £256 per dose, maybe double? Lasts a month?). Plus, does not recommend baked milk OIT as very low certainty of benefit. More evidence on effect, risks, QOL benefit obviously required.  

Sublingual/epicutaneous immunotherapy (SLIT) for milk? Not much evidence – low rate of success and high rate of relapse.

[EGPHAN 2023Frontiers in Pediatrics 2019; BMJ cmpa article sept 2013]

Rush study from Japan used microwaved milk – microwaved for 100s at 550W (!). Dosing was 2–4 times a day in hospital for several days (frequent adverse events) aiming for 200 mL dose (total daily, I assume). If not achieved, dose increases changed to 1ml per day. At 200ml, dosing changed to once a day. After 2 months of maintenance, length of time in the microwave gradually reduced.

Another Japanese study looked at using heated milk powder (3 mins at 125degC) vs unheated milk. Rush protocol (5 days in hospital) up to maintenance of just 3ml daily. At 1 year, 35% and 18% in the HM group and 50% and 31% in UM group passed the 3 and 25 mL OFCs, respectively, so not great efficacy. Rates of moderate or severe symptoms significantly lower (halved) in the heated milk group however.

Natasha Trial is looking at Peanut or cow’s milk OIT in UK – groups are Peanut age 6-23yrs, Peanut age 2-3yrs, Cow’s milk age 3-23yrs. Using everyday food products. Final results expected 2027.

Outcome

In small Korean study of kids aged 3-10, 83% has sustained unresponsiveness (stopped cow’s milk for 4 weeks, following 12 months of maintenance.

In a study of OIT plus omalizumab, about half had sustained unresponsiveness.

Duration of treatment appears to be key – in Japanese study, 2 years treatment had significantly more SU cf 1 yr treatment. Review here.

Topiramate

Used for epilepsy and migraine.

MHRA 2024 introduced pregnancy prevention programme, given risk of significant harm to unborn fetus (congenital malformation, low birth weight, potential increased risk of intellectual disability, autism/ADHD).

This stipulates that never used in pregnancy, but also not used in women of childbearing potential unless the conditions of the Pregnancy Prevention Programme are fulfilled, viz:

  • are using highly effective contraception
  • have a pregnancy test to exclude pregnancy before starting topiramate
  • are aware of the risks from use of topiramate

If used, women of childbearing potential must sign a Risk Awareness Form.

To make things more complicated, topiramate interacts with pretty much all oral contraceptives to decrease their effectiveness…

Food Challenges

Gold standard for diagnosis of a food allergy or intolerance. A challenge is only considered complete once a normal age-appropriate portion of the food has been consumed.

In certain cases, food challenge is potentially more dangerous, and should only be done after assessment and discussion of likely risks and benefits. If there is no reaction (“negative challenge”) then of course there will be less fear and more food options [at least if food is consumed regularly]. If there is a reaction (“positive challenge” is the preferred term, not “failed”) then there is no longer any doubt, and the child/family will experience a reaction (useful if child does not remember) and see how it is managed. Lots of families say that using their adrenaline autoinjector for the first time (if it comes to that) takes away a lot of the anxiety about using it in future, which is very useful. So always check patient/family prepared to administer if required.

Objective measures of symptoms/signs preferred. Eczema, wheeze, congestion, diarrhoea should all have resolved (or be optimal) prior to doing the challenge, to avoid potential confusion. The challenge can be blinded if there is still doubt.

2024 PRACTALL update (Hugh Sampson)

Discussion about reliability of skin prick tests etc. Table of PPVs based on Riggioni metanalysis.

In terms of safety, severe reactions possible even with milligram level doses (and even in children with tolerance to baked versions!). Test results do not predict, other than possibly 2S albumins and tree allergy.

Outpatient clinic rooms are included in potential setting. Other considerations are delayed reactions; asthma; previous reactions to trace amounts; whether on elimination diet (?).

IV access should be considered if prior “severe anaphylaxis”, severe asthma, or likely difficulties getting access if required.

Lots of levels useful if trying to establish threshold, but makes it harder to achieve “typical” dose within time available – and potential for “rush desensitisation” effect! Some reports that multiple dosing can cause reactions where single dose wouldn’t… So some regimens combine logarithmic and semi-logarithmic increases.

Target dose generally 2-3g protein. 5% false negative rate for 875mg (cumulative 3500mg) top dose. Shellfish and fish in particular need a high target dose. But depends on size of child too…

Suggests 1 egg, 140-200ml milk, 28g cheese, 2g peanut, 3g tree nut.

Lip challenges not recommended as little data, all suggesting it is unhelpful.

Dosing intervals typically 15-20 mins but not very logical, given many reactions take longer eg milk, peanut, cooked egg. So now recommends 20-30 mins…

For FPIES, have IV fluids and ondansetron available. Check IgE/SPT negative! Consider methylprednisolone (but no data!). Taking baseline and 4-6hr neutrophil counts useful (>1500 cells/ml rise diagnostic where symptoms subjective). 0.06–0.3 g of food protein per kilogram body weight (maximum 3 g protein), administered as a single serving or as 2–3 servings every 15–30 min, followed by 4 h observation.

Else, 1/3 of the food portion for age is done under physician observation followed by a home titration to a full dose (very low rate of mild (mostly diarrhea) delayed reactions later during the day of the OFC or within the first few days of home dosing) – better than risk of causing severe symptoms during a single feeding with a higher dose of food. Some reports of FPIES recurrence after negative challenge…