Category Archives: General paediatrics

Nasal flu vaccine

Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV).  Now available in quadrivalent form, Fluenz Tetra in Europe, Flumist in US.  Transmission to another person has only ever been documented once, and it was asymptomatic!

The extra B hopefully makes it better than 2014/15 where poor coverage.  Live attenuated is more effective and has less systemic effects than injected vaccines.

Current annual programme in Scotland is for all 2-5yr olds to be offered vaccine by public health, whereas all primary and secondary school children will be offered vaccine at school.
Cut off for 2yr olds is age 2 on 1st September.
For infants between 6 months and 2, previous hospital admission for lower respiratory tract infection (which would include all our bronchiolitis babies!) is a clinical risk indicator, along with asthma, chronic heart/kidney/neuroresp disease, or indeed anything else where you thing getting flu is likely to exacerbate the underlying condition.

If you miss your school appointment, up to the family to request another via NHS Lanarkshire vaccine helpline 01698 687456.

Although GPs aren’t much involved anymore in vaccine programme, they should still offer it if a family prefers it, or if a family are keen to get it earlier than they might otherwise as part of the schools programme.

Most kids will be offered nasal live flu vaccine (Fluenz Tetra).  Contraindications to nasal flu vaccine are:

  • under 2yrs of age,
  • wheezing or extra bronchodilator within the previous 72 hours,
  • severe immunodeficiency (esp cellular) or immunosuppression eg leukaemia/lymphoma, high dose oral steroids
  • aspirin use (eg Kawasaki) – theoretical risk of Reyes [reported with wild type influenza and aspirin]

Kids on high dose inhaled steroids no longer require consultant approval to get nasal vaccine.

Kids previously in PICU for asthma, or who require regular oral steroids for asthma, require consultant approval to get nasal vaccine. Otherwise they should get injectable.

If you can’t have nasal, then should get injectable (inactivated) vaccine.  Can be given from age 6 months.

A second dose is needed after 4 weeks minimum if you are in a clinical risk group, and under 9yrs, and this is the first time you are getting flu vaccine.  This applies whether you get nasal or injectable flu vaccine.

For egg allergy, advice, as before, is that children with egg allergy – including those with previous anaphylaxis to egg – can be safely vaccinated with nasal vaccine in any setting (including primary care and schools). The only exception is for children who have required admission to intensive care for previous severe anaphylaxis to egg, who should be offered nasal flu vaccine in hospital [lack of data, not definite risk!].

If a kid with egg allergy has a contraindication to nasal flu vaccine (eg immunosuppressed) and needs injectable vaccine, then it should be either an egg free (cell based) injectable vaccine (the one from Seqirus is licensed from age 2) or low egg content (“split virion inactivated vaccine”), viz less than 0.12mcg/ml (equivalent to 0.06 µg for 0.5 ml dose).

NSAID hypersensitivity

Ibuprofen etc are a common cause of reactions, but mostly non immune mediated, via COX -1 inhibition. Previously called pseudo-allergy or intolerance, best called hypersensitivity, then subdivided into allergic or non-allergic. Often occurs in patients with underlying problem eg asthma, chronic urticaria, rhinosinusitis – exacerbates underlying condition. Hypersensitivity can be to a single drug, or cross-reactive, ie to unrelated drugs from different families (salicylates ie aspirin, propionic derivatives eg ibuprofen, acetic acid derivatives eg diclofenac, etc). Cross reactivity suggests a non-immune mechanism. Without history to support single drug (or family) hypersensitivity, you would have to advise the patient to avoid all NSAIDs.

Testing

  • Skin testing with culprit drug is appropriate if you have an acute urticarial or angioedema reaction in a single drug/family.
  • Oral challenge is appropriate to confirm all types of hypersensitivity, esp in equivocal histories. At the same time, challenge with aspirin to check cross-reactivity, and with next best alternative NSAID. Start 1/10 dose, increase every 2 hours.
  • For nasal/bronchial symptoms, inhaled lysine aspirin is safer and faster, but only 77-90% sensitive cf 90% for oral. Intranasal is equivalent if inhaled/oral not possible.
  • If patient is on long term steroids, or else has been well controlled for a long time, sensitivity seems less!
  • Consider proceeding to challenge with COX2 (coxib) if challenge positive.

Aspirin desensitization works for NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease, and NSAID induced (cross reactive) skin disease, controversial for chronic urticaria and no data for single drug skin disease or anaphylaxis. But needs maintenance dosing so only really useful for chronic conditions eg needing antiplatelet therapy.

Allergy 2013:68;1219

UTI Treatment

See NICE CG224 (refers then to CG111 (pyelonephritis) and CG109 (lower tract UTI)): Under 3 months get IV treatment. Else 3 days oral treatment if lower tract, 7-10 days oral for upper tract. IV for vomiting, unable to take oral or severe illness (but also says underlying known anomalies should influence choice) 2-4 days IV then oral for total of 10 days (!). No preference between cefuroxime, ceftriaxone and gentamicin. Upper tract defined as fever else loin pain/tenderness

Cochrane review concluded that 2-4 day course of oral antibiotic is as effective as a 7-14 day course in the treatment of lower-tract UTIs in children. PMID 12535494 The majority of febrile infants with UTI have nuclear scan evidence of pyelonephritis, suggesting that infants should not receive short course treatment.

Also concluded that for pyelonephritis oral antibiotics are as effective as the combination of parenteral followed by oral antibiotics. Based on:

  • Hoberman’s RCT children under 2 with fever and UTI (n=300) – oral cefixime for 2 weeks as good as IV: no difference in defervescence, reinfection, scarring at 6 months (and much cheaper!). Severely ill excluded (eg CRT>3sec) – only 3! Funny group though, mean age of 8 months, 90% female, and a low scarring rate (15%). Pediatrics 99 Vol. 104: 79, Hoberman A.
  • Montini Multicentre RCT non-inferiority (n=502, 1/12 to 7yrs). Oral co-amoxiclav for 10 days equivalent to ceftriaxone for three days followed by oral in terms of DMSA scars, time to defervescence. BMJ 2007; 335:386-8

Crucial that oral antibiotics are not vomited, of course.

Gauthier et al treated infants and toddlers with febrile UTIs as outpatients using a single daily dose of intravenous gentamicin until the children were afebrile for at least 24 hours, after which oral amoxicillin (!) was given until the urinary culture report was available. Successful in three quarters. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 18(2):134-8, 2006

1/3 of UTI E coli resistant to trimethoprim, 2/3 if underlying renal abnormality. 61% of women with UTIs and resistant organisms do not reconsult! So should we use community surveillance to guide prescribing rather than individual culture and sensitivity?

UTI prophylaxis did not reduce recurrent infection (n=611). But lower rate (12%) reported than might be expected. Higher resistance rates are seen in recurrent infections, which could be anticipated (JAMA 2007;298;179)

UTI Follow up investigations – GGC guideline 2020

Same definitions of upper, lower and atypical. UTI definitions

  • Under 6/12, USS for all, within 6 weeks. Urgent if recurrent or atypical features (other than funny bugs).

UTI imaging under 6 months

  • Provided things settle within 48 hours of treatment, no further investigations are required unless atypical or recurrent, in which case everyone gets DMSA (6 months after infection) and MCUG.
  • 6/12 to 3yrs: USS only if doesn’t settle within 48 hours of treatment. If atypical or recurrent then USS and DMSA (USS urgent if atypical features, other than funny bugs), else within 6 weeks.

UTI imaging 6/12-3yrs

  • Consider MCUG if dilatation on US, or family history of VUR, or atypical bugs, or poor flow. (MAG3 if continent)
  • Over 3yrs: same, except no DMSA even if atypical features, and no mention of MCUG at all.

UTI imaging 3yrs+

If USS abnormal, refer for consideration of further imaging.

But:

  • USS – not much evidence for benefit, esp if normal antenatal scan, rarely changes management even if something minor found, but harmless. If dilatation seen, do MCUG urgently.
  • MCUG – like GORD, maybe you see reflux, maybe you don’t, so can you rely on it? NB Cost, radiation, discomfort…
  • DMSA – acutely, diagnoses pyelonephritis. Then remain positive for up to 6 months after an infection. Late scan diagnoses scars. But if negative during first UTI episode, rarely (NPV 88%) have VUR and never high-grade VUR. [J Pediatrics Volume 150, 1 , January 2007, 96-99]
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis – not routinely.  If considered on the basis of risk/benefit discussion, then use trimethoprim.  If trimethoprim resistance, consider strategy of early empirical treatment rather than use a broad spectrum antibiotic such as co-amoxiclav or cefalexin (else risk of highly resistant bugs). [Hoberman A, NEJM 2003] Review every 3-6 months.
  • Cycling of antibiotic for prophylaxis may be more rational eg every 2-4 weeks

Studies do not address whether placebo or nothing is worse than prophylaxis (Cochrane: suggests about 36% reduction in infection, but all 3 studies biased, and most other work has prophylaxis vs surgery). Eg Sweden, only screen if additional risk factor, and v low prevalence of scars. Garin study (Paeds 2006) non placebo controlled, found no protection from recurrent infection with antibiotic prophylaxis (the rate for those with reflux was close to significance but seemed to be cystitis rather than pyelo) – plus the bugs were resistant. The rate of scarring was actually higher in the prophylaxis group…

[(Roberts, Kenneth) PIDJ 23(12); 2004:1163-1164 ]

UTI Follow up investigations – NICE CG54

  • Under 6/12, OPD USS sufficient if good response to treatment within 48 hours.
  • Under 6/12 and atypical (see below) or recurrent (see below), then urgent USS to look for obstruction or severe reflux, or if simply non-E.coli then within 6 weeks.  PLUS later OPD DMSA (ie 4-6 months post infection), MCUG.
  • 6/12 to 3 yrs: nothing if good response to treatment within 48 hours. If atypical or recurrent, as above but no MCUG unless:
    • family history,
    • poor flow,
    • dilated tract on US,
    • non-E coli.
  • Over 3yrs: nothing if good response to treatment within 48 hours. If atypical, only needs urgent USS (OPD USS within 6 weeks if simply non-E.coli). If recurrent, do OPD USS and later DMSA.

Atypical defined as seriously ill, poor urine flow, abdominal/bladder mass, raised creatinine, septicaemia, failure to respond to appropriate antibiotics within 48 hrs, non-E. coli infection

Recurrent defined as 3 lower tract UTIs, else 1 upper tract plus any other

If another UTI occurs before the DMSA is done, don’t defer DMSA in case scarring already established.

Prophylactic antibiotics for MCUG (1 day before to 1 day after).

UTI diagnosis

See NICE 224 (2022).

Classic symptoms – dysuria, frequency, new wetting, dark or cloudy or smelly urine.  Frank haematuria, loin pain.  Fever, shivering (rigors), history of UTI. 

Clean catch ideally, pad (commercial, not cotton wool balls or gauze) if clean catch unsuccessful. Else catheter.  Suprapubic aspiration is an option but needs ultrasound to confirm bladder full.

See Sofia method of urine collection.

 

Testing

Under 3 months – send for culture and microscopy. Urgent?

Microscopy interpretation is simply on basis of pyuria pos/neg, bacteria pos/neg.

Over 3/12, dipstick is standard. A positive dipstick urinalysis for BOTH leucocyte esterase (LE) and nitrite is specific, negative both is a good negative predictor. If dipstick positive for just one, not reliable either way. Metanalysis, Huicho Luis, PIDJ 2002;21:1-11. Previous metanalysis by Gorelick and Shaw (Peds 1999) concluded nitrite/LE tests superior to microscopy!

If nitrites and leucocytes positive, assume infection. Culture only if high risk for serious infection or recurrent UTI.

Nitrites only positive, treat but send culture.

Leucocytes only positive, send culture, treat if classic UTI symptoms or under 3yrs, else await result before treating.

Culture if high risk of serious illness, upper tract signs, poor response to treatment, recurrent UTI.

Most studies show that clean catch is equivalent to suprapubic aspiration (SPA); limited data on pad, nappy or bag specimens.

Uricol (Euron, Newcastle) urine pads. Check at 10 min intervals (discard after 30mins). Cost 18p each. Agrees with clean catch for gluc/ket/blood/nitrite (within 1 block ) but in study only 2 cases with leucocytes so ?reliable.

Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England). 10(36):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-154, 2006 Oct.

Urinary Tract Infection

See also:

A common, potentially serious, infection in children.  More common in girls over the age of 3 months, more common in boys below that.

Generally occurs by ascending infection from urethra.  Most common organisms are E coli, Klebsiella, Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus.  Infection appears to develop clinically when bacteria in the urine manage to adhere, hence depends on presence of fimbriae on bacterium, and ability of urothelium to resist adhesion (genetic factors).

Classic symptoms are of cystitis:

  • Urinary urgency and frequency (although amounts may be very small)
  • Dysuria
  • Haematuria
  • Suprapubic pain

There may be systemic features, eg fever, nausea/vomiting, lethargy.  However these are more common if the infection progresses to pyelonephritis:

  • unilateral loin pain
  • features of sepsis

Besides the inconvenience, particularly or recurrent cystitis, there is also the risk of long term kidney damage (chronic pyelonephritis, with renal scarring).

Risk factors

  • Constipation
  • Poor fluid intake
  • Withholding of urine for prolonged periods
  • Indwelling catheter

Immunodeficiencies rarely increase risk of UTI, neutrophil disorders are perhaps the exception.

Complications

Besides septicaemia, the major complication of concern is renal scarring, with potential for long term chronic pyelonephritis and premature renal failure.

Risk factors are: (n=1280)

  • temperature >=39degC,
  • a bug other than Escherichia coli,
  • abnormal ultrasound
  • neutrophil count >60%, CRP>40 mg/L,
  • Vesico-ureteric Reflux (VUR)

Having 2 or more of the first 3 puts you in a high risk group with double the overall risk of scarring (30 vs 15% in this study).  Covers 21% of the total sample.  Sensitivity is so-so: catches 44.9% of all scarring.

Adding in bloods and/or a micturating cystourethrogram (MCUG) only increases the predictive value by 3-5%. [JAMA Pediatrics. 168(10):893-900, 2014 Oct.  PMID: 25089634]

There are many studies showing that scars can develop without reflux, and that many children with reflux (but without infections) do not develop scars. Scars are associated also with delayed treatment.  Cochrane review did not come out strongly in favour of identifying VUR – nine reimplantations would be required to prevent just one febrile UTI, with no reduction at all in the number of children developing any UTI or renal damage. Archives, 2003

What is the risk of long term damage? Low, given that UTI is common, the occurrence of CRF is rare, and acute pyelonephritis with severe long term complications is also rare. The only large population-based study (n= 1221) found a low risk of hypertension after 16-26 years: only 9% of children with scarred kidneys became hypertensive cf 6% for unscarred. Glomerular filtration rate in later life was normal in both those with and without scarring. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:357-361

Follow up investigations

Apart from addressing risk factors, you need to consider looking for underlying VUR or else evidence of renal scarring.  See NICE CG54 guidelines.  For Scotland, see SPRUN guidelines.

Testes

Bilateral impalpable testes at birth are associated with complex endocrine disorders and prune belly syndrome, so should be investigated within 2 weeks.

Warm hands and room will help find a testis, of course. Can the testis be manipulated into the scrotum? In that case retractile, not undescended.

A testis can be undescended but palpable eg in the inguinal canal. If retractile, then needs no intervention.

For suspected unilateral undescended testis, re-examine at 6–8 weeks, and again at 4–5 months of age, if needed. If the testis remains undescended, refer to paediatric surgery to consider surgery.

Rarely non retractile testis found later in childhood – “ascending testis” – ?cord shortening.  Usually age 8-10, not so urgent as initial development already complete. Seems to be more likely if retractile in the first place – family should keep an eye on them!

If not palpable then may be intraabdominal, absent, small (dysplastic, but in the right place) or else ectopic. Imaging is not sensitive so often diagnostic laparascopy is required. Ectopic testes are found in the perineum or femoral triangle, they are usually normal and orchidopexy is straightforward.

An undescended testis is seen in 5% of term infants but less than 2% of 1yr olds. It is theorized that part of the reason for poor descent is that they are fundamentally abnormal. If left for more than 4yrs then histological abnormalities often seen so generally repaired/removed between 1 and 4 yrs of age. Commonly associated with inguinal hernia, in which case fixed earlier with the hernia.

After surgery, advise self examination as increased risk of testicular cancer.

[NICE CKS]

Kawasaki syndrome

A syndrome of unknown cause, characterised by persistent fever, conjunctivitis and mucosal changes eg strawberry tongue in a young child who has often been treated empirically with antibiotics without improvement, and is invariably miserable. Potentially complicated by coronary aneurysms, which may be fatal. Kawasaki’s is the leading cause of acquired heart disease globally after rheumatic fever, and is the leading cause in the North.

It is a vasculitis affecting medium sized arteries, and other arterial vessels down to capillary size. Second most common vasculitis in childhood, after IgA vasculitis.

Was thought to be a superantigen disorder, ie with no specific infectious agent, polyclonal B activation – coronary aneurysms have been seen in other superantigen diseases eg toxic shock, have also been reported in meningococcal septicaemia. But now thought to be conventional, but unknown, infectious trigger.

Similarities with COVID PIMS-TS.

Genetics important, risk higher in East Asian immigrants, plus family history, single nucelotide polymorphisms found in 6 genes including FcγR2a, caspase 3 (CASP3), and human leukocyte antigen class II.

Clustering has been shown (Knox test significant within the space-time interval of 3 km and 3-5 days) which suggests an infectious trigger [PIDJ 27(11):981-985, Nov 2008]. TNF alpha seems important, in an animal model, knock out mice or anti TNF treatment prevents aneurysm development.

The underlying pathology is a vasculitis, and although coronary disease is the best recognized there is increasing evidence that other medium sized arteries are affected with descriptions in the literature of peripheral gangrene and cerebral infarction. Proposed model includes necrotizing vasculitis, plus chronic/subacute vasculitis, 2 weeks after onset and sometimes lasting months, with a unique type of luminal myofibroblastic proliferation. 

Epidemiology

More common in males, peak age 18-24 months.

BPSU Kawasaki – 553 cases were notified: 389 had complete KD, 46 had atypical KD and 116 had incomplete KD!  Median time to IVIG in those with Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) was 10 days cf 7 days for those without.  Rate of CAA in under 1yr was 39%.  19% overall had CAA despite treatment.  Associated with low albumin, and incomplete.  Only 1.6% developed giant aneurysms, which have the worst prognosis, of course.

Risk of CAA estimated at 20-40% if untreated.  [Archives PMID 30104394]

Incidence in west seems to have plateaued, after decades of increase (?ascertainment bias). 10-20x higher rate in NE Asia (Japan, Taiwan, Korea), plus continues to increase! 1% of all Japanese kids will have had KD by age 10. But unrecognized before 1950, whereas pathological specimens in UK from over a 100yrs ago show same process.

Less complications in Asia!  Better diagnosis? Arguably all European cases could be considered high risk…

Japan has had 3 epidemics, the only country to have had them, but none since 1986.

Data from China and India indicate increase, with only a few case reports prior to 1990. Rate in Chandigarh equivalent to UK now, presumably underestimate, but already outnumbers rheumatic fever cases.  Also high rate in Kerala, but related to affluence or health care availability?    Rate in Shanghai approaching NE Asia rate. Rate in Hong Kong has tripled in 20 years. Will become the predominant cause of acquired cardiac disease?

Association between seasonal wind patterns in Pacific and KD rates in Japan, California and Hawaii! May relate to infectious agents.

[Singh S, et al. Arch Dis Child 2015;100:1084–1088. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307536]

Case definition

(American Heart Association):

  • Fever of 5 days duration or more
  • plus 4 of the following (ie only drop 1):
    1. Conjunctivitis: Bilateral, bulbar, without exudate
    2. Lymphadenopathy: Cervical, >1.5 cm
    3. Rash: Polymorphous, no vesicles or crusts
    4. Changes of lips or oral mucosa: Red cracked lips; “strawberry” tongue; or diffuse erythema of oropharynx
    5. Changes of extremities:
      • Initial stage, erythema and oedema of palms and soles
      • Convalescent stage (about two weeks) periungual desquamation of fingers and toes
Images from Circulation journal 2017

These are all acute febrile stage symptoms, first 2 weeks (besides the desquamation) – but not necessarily all at the same time, sometimes only on history. After 2 weeks, persistent irritability, poor appetite, conjunctival injection. If still febrile at this point then high risk of cardiac complications. Any coronary artery ectasia or aneurysms may enlarge from week 4-8. Ectasia may resolve.

In Japan, prolonged fever is one of the optional features – 1/3 of Japanese children get IVIG before day 4! McCrindle guideline (AHA, 2017) suggests complete Kawasaki disease may be diagnosed with 4 days (possibly even 3 days) fever if one of the features is peripheral erythema/swelling.

Many people would also diagnose if only 3 of these features plus coronary artery aneurysms detected. Lymphadenopathy is the least common feature (?easy to miss) – esp uncommon in younger children. Perineal desquamation is also quite characteristic.

There may also be abdominal pain, diarrhoea, hepatitis/pancreatitis, arthralgia/arthritis, aseptic meningitis, facial nerve palsy and pneumonitis (with or without pulmonary nodules). There may be a murmur (mitral incompetence), and myocarditis can occur but it is rarely severe. CXR changes (nodules, peribronchial and interstitial infiltrates). Aortic root enlargement. Desquamation in groin. Hydrocoele and gall bladder hydrops! Anterior uveitis. Renal involvement, encephalopathy have been described, macrophage activation syndrome has been reported rarely.

Pitfalls –

  • infants, adolescents (“glandular fever”).
  • Signs change over time – rash fades, desquamates, then nail changes but similarly lymph nodes, mouth changes.  So at any one time only a few features may be evident – especially beyond first week.
  • Normal or low platelets (actually a high risk feature in some scoring systems)
  • Sterile pyuria (“UTI”), “aseptic meningitis”
  • Presentations with myocarditis, surgical abdomen (GI vasculitis)
  • Single dose of IVIG without response does not mean diagnosis is wrong, in fact means more aggressive treatment required.
  • Beware positive cultures putting you off diagnosis! Might be triggering infection! Even Strep, adenovirus

Tips –                           

  • BCG reactivation as a clue
  • Arthritis as a clue
  • Axillary/inguinal aneurysms on examination? [Janet G-M]
  • Repeat echo early, especially where diagnosis still not clear cut. Cardiology need chasing!?
  • IVIG raises ESR! Don’t interpret as treatment failure!
  • Incomplete/uncertain have highest risk of complications! So consider if fever >=5/7 with 2 criteria, or infants [only infants?] with fever >= 7/7 without necessarily any criteria, but no other explanation! CRP>30 and ESR>40 should trigger further assessment eg echo and use of additional lab criteria eg anaemia, high platelets (>450 beyond day 7, but also <140), high ALT, high WCC (>15), low albumin (<30) . Echo if CRP/ESR low but peeling. 3 or more additional lab criteria sufficient to make diagnosis.

Many of the clinical features of the disease are outbreak dependent with a different spectrum of clinical findings in one mini-outbreak compared with another, and with cases having similar clinical phenotypes clustering temporally.

So consider echo in any young child with persistent fever.

The term atypical or incomplete Kawasaki disease is used for cases without the required number of features. Whether this is the same disease or not is unclear; there will undoubtedly be some cases that overlap with other systemic vasculitides eg polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). In PAN, mucocutaneous changes are uncommon, whereas renal disease is common. Gall bladder hydrops appears to be unique to Kawasaki’s. On the other hand, having a rigid case definition is perhaps unhelpful since incomplete cases are often seen, particularly in infants, and are associated with a delay in diagnosis and worse prognosis. Under the age of 3 months, the majority of cases with coronary aneurysms have atypical presentations.

McCrindle AHA guideline suggest incomplete KD should be diagnosed where:

Differential diagnosis

Investigations mainly help exclude alternative diagnoses. Infection may have triggered KD so may need to treat for both – antibiotics if concern – get cultures. Typically with the disease itself test results simply indicate systemic inflammation and can be useful for monitoring response to treatment. Hence there are usually elevated white cells, platelets, ESR and CRP, ferritin/coag (MAS?), troponin (myocardial involvement?), D-dimers, LDH. Liver function tests are often mildly deranged. Low sodium and albumin suggest vascular leak. The ECG may have PR interval changes, and ST segment or T wave changes. Echocardiography (ideally within 2 weeks of onset of fever but as soon as possible) may reveal dilated, ectatic coronary arteries or frank aneurysms.

Consider CXR, Abdo USS (incl gall bladder).

Treatment

SPARN 2024 guidelines (based on AHA) advises taking serum for storage if possible, prior to IVIG. Refer for echo within 1-2 days assuming normal ECG and CXR. Admit under Infectious diseases or Rheumatology unless cardiomegaly, abnormal ECG, heart failure or giant aneurysms.

As with Eleftheriou (2013) guidelines, methylprednisolone in addition to IVIG/aspirin if high risk viz infants, severe inflammation (CRP>100, liver dysfunction, hypoalbuminaemia, anaemia), shock or HLH, evolving anuerysms/ectasia, failed IVIG – consider if thrombocytopaenia, late presentation). Infliximab is included as an option for resistant or recrudescent disease. Of course, diagnosis should be reconsidered if response to treatment is poor.

Standard treatment is with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) 2g/kg over 12 hours, ideally within the first 7-10 days of the illness, and with aspirin (high initial dose 30-50 mg/kg/day in 4 divided doses orally during the acute phase – AHA still recommends before switching to low dose but insufficient evidence of benefit). This combination reduces the risk of aneurysm formation from 25% to 9%. Most will respond to a single dose, but about 20% will require a second dose. Add steroids if not given already and consider second dose if persistent fever and/or failure of CRP to fall at least 50% within 48 hours. Of these, only a half will then defervesce.

IVIG side effects – fever, headache, joint pain, aseptic meningitis, BBV, allergic reaction (?), raised ESR. Remember to defer immunisations for 3 months.

Once defervescence has occurred, the aspirin dose can be reduced to an anti-platelet dose of 3-5mg/kg/day (max 75mg). Aspirin is stopped after 6 weeks unless aneurysms found.

Duration of fever is the most powerful predictor of poor coronary outcome (one additional day of fever increasing the odds of aneurysm development by 3-5x). Delayed diagnosis is usually a reflection of slow evolution of criteria rather than atypical presentation – in that study, diagnosis after 10 days had a 2.8x higher risk of aneurysms (although they also had higher platelet counts). [Pediatrics. 115(4):e428-33, 2005. PMID 15805345]

Methylprednisolone treatment is 0.8mg/kg BD IV for 5-7 day or until CRP normal, followed by Prednisolone 2mg/kg weaning over 2-3 weeks. Other regimes are Methylpred 10-30mg/kg IV OD for 3 days followed by prednisolone.

In Europe steroids reserved for worse cases – but by epidemiology, all European cases could be considered high risk?? 39% of under 1yrs had coronary aneurysms (BPSU study). Europe Kawasaki trial in progress (KDCAAP) – Adding immediate corticosteroid treatment to standard of care IVIG and aspirin.

Scoring

Several scorings systems have been developed to predict IVIG resistance and poor outcome. Kobayashi criteria used to predict IVIG failure (5+ points), but more sensitive in Japanese populations – just 33% in Non-Japanese, with 87% specificity:

  • Age<12 months (2 points)
  • Fever <=4 days (1 point)
  • Na<=133 (2 points)
  • ALT>=100 (1 point)
  • Plts <300 (1 point)
  • CRP>10 (1 point)
  • >80% neutrophils (2 points)

Echo

ECG and echo should be done as soon as possible but should not delay treatment. Urgent if heart failure, cardiomegaly on CXR or ECG abnormalities. If first echo is normal and CRP normal after 1 week, repeat scans recommended at 2 and 6-8 weeks. But chase cardiology to repeat early if diagnosis unclear.

Those with Z score more than 10 (“large”) have 25% risk of coronary event within 10yrs (girls), 50% (boys)!

Most aneurysms will resolve over time, unless they are giant (>8mm). Serial echocardiography should be done to monitor resolution. Evidence of subacute chronic vasculitis for months (post-mortem cases) so move now to infliximab treatment etc after initial immunosuppression.

Warfarin should be considered for giant aneurysms, with initial heparinization to prevent paradoxical thrombosis, although its potential for complications in young children is significant. Stress testing and angiography may be appropriate. Aspirin can be discontinued if aneurysms resolve, but it is likely that the atherosclerosis risk remains high and life long follow up to address other risk factors is sensible.

Mortality in the UK has been as high as 3.7%, but is much lower in Japan.

[2020 ArchDisChild Ed and Practice Kelly]

[2017 AHA guidelines]

[Eleftheriou Arch Dis Child 2014;99:74–83, J Paed and Child Health 49 (2013) 614–623]